COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE IN CAD-CAM HYBRID-CERAMIC VERSUS INDIRECT COMPOSITE ONLAYS Article Swipe
YOU?
·
· 2024
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/91xznr22
Marginal adaptation and microleakage are key factors that affect the long-term success of onlay restorations. CAD-CAM hybrid-ceramic materials may offer better fit and sealing compared with conventional indirect composites, but local evidence is limited. Objective: To compare the marginal adaptation and microleakage of CAD-CAM hybrid-ceramic onlays with indirect composite onlays after thermocycling. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted mandibular molars were prepared using a standardized MOD cavity design. Teeth were randomly divided into two groups: hybrid-ceramic onlays (PICN blocks) and laboratory-processed indirect composite onlays. All restorations were cemented with dual-cure resin cement under standardized load. Specimens underwent 5,000 thermocycles (5°C–55°C). Marginal gaps were measured before and after aging using a digital stereomicroscope. Microleakage was assessed using methylene blue dye penetration on sectioned samples. Data were analyzed to compare both groups. Results: Hybrid-ceramic onlays showed significantly smaller marginal gaps before aging (37–40 μm) than composite onlays (103–113 μm). After thermocycling, hybrid-ceramic margins remained within clinical limits (63–66 μm), while composites increased to 112–123 μm. Hybrid-ceramic onlays also showed lower microleakage (mean 11.6%) compared with composites (mean 21.7%).
Related Topics
- Type
- article
- Landing Page
- https://doi.org/10.53555/91xznr22
- https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/article/download/12324/11498
- OA Status
- gold
- OpenAlex ID
- https://openalex.org/W4416536966
Raw OpenAlex JSON
- OpenAlex ID
-
https://openalex.org/W4416536966Canonical identifier for this work in OpenAlex
- DOI
-
https://doi.org/10.53555/91xznr22Digital Object Identifier
- Title
-
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE IN CAD-CAM HYBRID-CERAMIC VERSUS INDIRECT COMPOSITE ONLAYSWork title
- Type
-
articleOpenAlex work type
- Publication year
-
2024Year of publication
- Publication date
-
2024-01-01Full publication date if available
- Authors
-
Saba Khan, Fozia Bari, Ambreen Azam, Kinza ManzoorList of authors in order
- Landing page
-
https://doi.org/10.53555/91xznr22Publisher landing page
- PDF URL
-
https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/article/download/12324/11498Direct link to full text PDF
- Open access
-
YesWhether a free full text is available
- OA status
-
goldOpen access status per OpenAlex
- OA URL
-
https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/article/download/12324/11498Direct OA link when available
- Cited by
-
0Total citation count in OpenAlex
Full payload
| id | https://openalex.org/W4416536966 |
|---|---|
| doi | https://doi.org/10.53555/91xznr22 |
| ids.doi | https://doi.org/10.53555/91xznr22 |
| ids.openalex | https://openalex.org/W4416536966 |
| fwci | 0.0 |
| type | article |
| title | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE IN CAD-CAM HYBRID-CERAMIC VERSUS INDIRECT COMPOSITE ONLAYS |
| biblio.issue | |
| biblio.volume | |
| biblio.last_page | |
| biblio.first_page | |
| is_xpac | False |
| apc_list | |
| apc_paid | |
| language | |
| locations[0].id | doi:10.53555/91xznr22 |
| locations[0].is_oa | True |
| locations[0].source | |
| locations[0].license | cc-by-nc |
| locations[0].pdf_url | https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/article/download/12324/11498 |
| locations[0].version | publishedVersion |
| locations[0].raw_type | journal-article |
| locations[0].license_id | https://openalex.org/licenses/cc-by-nc |
| locations[0].is_accepted | True |
| locations[0].is_published | True |
| locations[0].raw_source_name | Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology |
| locations[0].landing_page_url | https://doi.org/10.53555/91xznr22 |
| indexed_in | crossref |
| authorships[0].author.id | https://openalex.org/A5040721530 |
| authorships[0].author.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6140-8152 |
| authorships[0].author.display_name | Saba Khan |
| authorships[0].author_position | middle |
| authorships[0].raw_author_name | Saba Ajmeer khan |
| authorships[0].is_corresponding | False |
| authorships[1].author.id | https://openalex.org/A5120372929 |
| authorships[1].author.orcid | |
| authorships[1].author.display_name | Fozia Bari |
| authorships[1].author_position | middle |
| authorships[1].raw_author_name | Dr. Fozia Bari |
| authorships[1].is_corresponding | False |
| authorships[2].author.id | https://openalex.org/A5108621123 |
| authorships[2].author.orcid | |
| authorships[2].author.display_name | Ambreen Azam |
| authorships[2].author_position | last |
| authorships[2].raw_author_name | Ambreen Azam |
| authorships[2].is_corresponding | False |
| authorships[3].author.id | https://openalex.org/A5113416886 |
| authorships[3].author.orcid | |
| authorships[3].author.display_name | Kinza Manzoor |
| authorships[3].author_position | middle |
| authorships[3].raw_author_name | Kinza Manzoor |
| authorships[3].is_corresponding | False |
| has_content.pdf | True |
| has_content.grobid_xml | False |
| is_paratext | False |
| open_access.is_oa | True |
| open_access.oa_url | https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/article/download/12324/11498 |
| open_access.oa_status | gold |
| open_access.any_repository_has_fulltext | False |
| created_date | 2025-11-23T00:00:00 |
| display_name | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE IN CAD-CAM HYBRID-CERAMIC VERSUS INDIRECT COMPOSITE ONLAYS |
| has_fulltext | False |
| is_retracted | False |
| updated_date | 2025-11-28T16:47:26.526610 |
| primary_topic | |
| cited_by_count | 0 |
| locations_count | 1 |
| best_oa_location.id | doi:10.53555/91xznr22 |
| best_oa_location.is_oa | True |
| best_oa_location.source | |
| best_oa_location.license | cc-by-nc |
| best_oa_location.pdf_url | https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/article/download/12324/11498 |
| best_oa_location.version | publishedVersion |
| best_oa_location.raw_type | journal-article |
| best_oa_location.license_id | https://openalex.org/licenses/cc-by-nc |
| best_oa_location.is_accepted | True |
| best_oa_location.is_published | True |
| best_oa_location.raw_source_name | Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology |
| best_oa_location.landing_page_url | https://doi.org/10.53555/91xznr22 |
| primary_location.id | doi:10.53555/91xznr22 |
| primary_location.is_oa | True |
| primary_location.source | |
| primary_location.license | cc-by-nc |
| primary_location.pdf_url | https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/article/download/12324/11498 |
| primary_location.version | publishedVersion |
| primary_location.raw_type | journal-article |
| primary_location.license_id | https://openalex.org/licenses/cc-by-nc |
| primary_location.is_accepted | True |
| primary_location.is_published | True |
| primary_location.raw_source_name | Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology |
| primary_location.landing_page_url | https://doi.org/10.53555/91xznr22 |
| publication_date | 2024-01-01 |
| publication_year | 2024 |
| referenced_works_count | 0 |
| abstract_inverted_index.a | 62, 108 |
| abstract_inverted_index.To | 35 |
| abstract_inverted_index.is | 32 |
| abstract_inverted_index.of | 12, 42 |
| abstract_inverted_index.on | 119 |
| abstract_inverted_index.to | 125, 159 |
| abstract_inverted_index.All | 83 |
| abstract_inverted_index.MOD | 64 |
| abstract_inverted_index.and | 2, 22, 40, 53, 78, 104 |
| abstract_inverted_index.are | 4 |
| abstract_inverted_index.but | 29 |
| abstract_inverted_index.dye | 117 |
| abstract_inverted_index.fit | 21 |
| abstract_inverted_index.key | 5 |
| abstract_inverted_index.may | 18 |
| abstract_inverted_index.the | 9, 37 |
| abstract_inverted_index.two | 72 |
| abstract_inverted_index.was | 112 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Data | 122 |
| abstract_inverted_index.also | 164 |
| abstract_inverted_index.blue | 116 |
| abstract_inverted_index.both | 127 |
| abstract_inverted_index.gaps | 100, 136 |
| abstract_inverted_index.into | 71 |
| abstract_inverted_index.than | 141 |
| abstract_inverted_index.that | 7 |
| abstract_inverted_index.were | 59, 68, 85, 101, 123 |
| abstract_inverted_index.with | 25, 46, 87, 171 |
| abstract_inverted_index.μm) | 140 |
| abstract_inverted_index.μm. | 161 |
| abstract_inverted_index.(PICN | 76 |
| abstract_inverted_index.(mean | 168, 173 |
| abstract_inverted_index.5,000 | 96 |
| abstract_inverted_index.After | 146 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Teeth | 67 |
| abstract_inverted_index.after | 50, 105 |
| abstract_inverted_index.aging | 106, 138 |
| abstract_inverted_index.load. | 93 |
| abstract_inverted_index.local | 30 |
| abstract_inverted_index.lower | 166 |
| abstract_inverted_index.offer | 19 |
| abstract_inverted_index.onlay | 13 |
| abstract_inverted_index.resin | 89 |
| abstract_inverted_index.under | 91 |
| abstract_inverted_index.using | 61, 107, 114 |
| abstract_inverted_index.while | 156 |
| abstract_inverted_index.μm), | 155 |
| abstract_inverted_index.μm). | 145 |
| abstract_inverted_index.11.6%) | 169 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Eighty | 55 |
| abstract_inverted_index.affect | 8 |
| abstract_inverted_index.before | 103, 137 |
| abstract_inverted_index.better | 20 |
| abstract_inverted_index.cavity | 65 |
| abstract_inverted_index.cement | 90 |
| abstract_inverted_index.limits | 153 |
| abstract_inverted_index.molars | 58 |
| abstract_inverted_index.onlays | 45, 49, 75, 131, 143, 163 |
| abstract_inverted_index.showed | 132, 165 |
| abstract_inverted_index.within | 151 |
| abstract_inverted_index.21.7%). | 174 |
| abstract_inverted_index.CAD-CAM | 15, 43 |
| abstract_inverted_index.blocks) | 77 |
| abstract_inverted_index.compare | 36, 126 |
| abstract_inverted_index.design. | 66 |
| abstract_inverted_index.digital | 109 |
| abstract_inverted_index.divided | 70 |
| abstract_inverted_index.factors | 6 |
| abstract_inverted_index.groups. | 128 |
| abstract_inverted_index.groups: | 73 |
| abstract_inverted_index.margins | 149 |
| abstract_inverted_index.onlays. | 82 |
| abstract_inverted_index.sealing | 23 |
| abstract_inverted_index.smaller | 134 |
| abstract_inverted_index.success | 11 |
| abstract_inverted_index.(37–40 | 139 |
| abstract_inverted_index.(63–66 | 154 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Marginal | 0, 99 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Methods: | 54 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Results: | 129 |
| abstract_inverted_index.analyzed | 124 |
| abstract_inverted_index.assessed | 113 |
| abstract_inverted_index.cemented | 86 |
| abstract_inverted_index.clinical | 152 |
| abstract_inverted_index.compared | 24, 170 |
| abstract_inverted_index.evidence | 31 |
| abstract_inverted_index.indirect | 27, 47, 80 |
| abstract_inverted_index.limited. | 33 |
| abstract_inverted_index.marginal | 38, 135 |
| abstract_inverted_index.measured | 102 |
| abstract_inverted_index.prepared | 60 |
| abstract_inverted_index.randomly | 69 |
| abstract_inverted_index.remained | 150 |
| abstract_inverted_index.samples. | 121 |
| abstract_inverted_index.112–123 | 160 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Materials | 52 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Specimens | 94 |
| abstract_inverted_index.composite | 48, 81, 142 |
| abstract_inverted_index.dual-cure | 88 |
| abstract_inverted_index.extracted | 56 |
| abstract_inverted_index.increased | 158 |
| abstract_inverted_index.long-term | 10 |
| abstract_inverted_index.materials | 17 |
| abstract_inverted_index.methylene | 115 |
| abstract_inverted_index.sectioned | 120 |
| abstract_inverted_index.underwent | 95 |
| abstract_inverted_index.(103–113 | 144 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Objective: | 34 |
| abstract_inverted_index.adaptation | 1, 39 |
| abstract_inverted_index.composites | 157, 172 |
| abstract_inverted_index.mandibular | 57 |
| abstract_inverted_index.composites, | 28 |
| abstract_inverted_index.penetration | 118 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Microleakage | 111 |
| abstract_inverted_index.conventional | 26 |
| abstract_inverted_index.microleakage | 3, 41, 167 |
| abstract_inverted_index.restorations | 84 |
| abstract_inverted_index.standardized | 63, 92 |
| abstract_inverted_index.thermocycles | 97 |
| abstract_inverted_index.restorations. | 14 |
| abstract_inverted_index.significantly | 133 |
| abstract_inverted_index.Hybrid-ceramic | 130, 162 |
| abstract_inverted_index.hybrid-ceramic | 16, 44, 74, 148 |
| abstract_inverted_index.thermocycling, | 147 |
| abstract_inverted_index.thermocycling. | 51 |
| abstract_inverted_index.(5°C–55°C). | 98 |
| abstract_inverted_index.stereomicroscope. | 110 |
| abstract_inverted_index.laboratory-processed | 79 |
| cited_by_percentile_year | |
| countries_distinct_count | 0 |
| institutions_distinct_count | 4 |
| citation_normalized_percentile |