Sequential Selection Procedures and False Discovery Rate Control Article Swipe
Related Concepts
Selection (genetic algorithm)
False discovery rate
Multiple comparisons problem
Computer science
Early stopping
Sequential analysis
Control (management)
Statistical hypothesis testing
Model selection
Point (geometry)
Block (permutation group theory)
Algorithm
Mathematics
Machine learning
Statistics
Artificial intelligence
Combinatorics
Geometry
Chemistry
Artificial neural network
Gene
Biochemistry
Max G’Sell
,
Stefan Wager
,
Alexandra Chouldechova
,
Robert Tibshirani
·
YOU?
·
· 2015
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12122
· OA: W1871418963
YOU?
·
· 2015
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12122
· OA: W1871418963
Summary We consider a multiple-hypothesis testing setting where the hypotheses are ordered and one is only permitted to reject an initial contiguous block H1,…,Hk of hypotheses. A rejection rule in this setting amounts to a procedure for choosing the stopping point k. This setting is inspired by the sequential nature of many model selection problems, where choosing a stopping point or a model is equivalent to rejecting all hypotheses up to that point and none thereafter. We propose two new testing procedures and prove that they control the false discovery rate in the ordered testing setting. We also show how the methods can be applied to model selection by using recent results on p-values in sequential model selection settings.
Related Topics
Finding more related topics…