Comparison of the Bedside Head-Impulse Test with the Video Head-Impulse Test in a Clinical Practice Setting: A Prospective Study of 500 Outpatients Article Swipe
Related Concepts
Chun Wai Yip
,
M. Gläser
,
Claudia Frenzel
,
Otmar Bayer
,
Michael Strupp
·
YOU?
·
· 2016
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2016.00058
· OA: W2339840246
YOU?
·
· 2016
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2016.00058
· OA: W2339840246
For the primary outcome, the bHIT had moderate sensitivity and low PPV. While the study did not elucidate the best choice for vHIT reference, it demonstrated how the bHIT test properties varied with vHIT thresholds: selecting a lower threshold improved the sensitivity but diminished the PPV, while a higher threshold had the opposite effect. The VOR was most likely normal if the bHIT was negative due to its high NPV. The bHIT was moderately sensitive for detecting unilateral and bilateral vestibulopathy overall, but better for certain subgroups.
Related Topics
Finding more related topics…