Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies Article Swipe
Related Concepts
Matthew D. F. McInnes
,
David Moher
,
Brett D. Thombs
,
Trevor A. McGrath
,
Patrick M. Bossuyt
,
Tammy Clifford
,
Jérémie F. Cohen
,
Jonathan J Deeks
,
Constantine Gatsonis
,
Lotty Hooft
,
Harriet Hunt
,
Christopher Hyde
,
Daniël A. Korevaar
,
Mariska Leeflang
,
Petra Macaskill
,
Johannes B. Reitsma
,
Rachel Rodin
,
Anne WS Rutjes
,
Jean‐Paul Salameh
,
Adrienne Stevens
,
Yemisi Takwoingi
,
Marcello Tonelli
,
Laura Weeks
,
Penny Whiting
,
Brian H Willis
,
Brian H. Willis
·
YOU?
·
· 2018
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163
· OA: W2785704959
YOU?
·
· 2018
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163
· OA: W2785704959
The 27-item PRISMA diagnostic test accuracy checklist provides specific guidance for reporting of systematic reviews. The PRISMA diagnostic test accuracy guideline can facilitate the transparent reporting of reviews, and may assist in the evaluation of validity and applicability, enhance replicability of reviews, and make the results from systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies more useful.
Related Topics
Finding more related topics…