Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Article Swipe
Related Concepts
Pedro T. Ramírez
,
Michael Frumovitz
,
René Pareja
,
Aldo López
,
Marcelo de Andrade Vieira
,
Reitan Ribeiro
,
Alessandro Buda
,
Xiaojian Yan
,
Shuzhong Yao
,
Naven Chetty
,
David Isla
,
Mariano Tamura
,
Tao Zhu
,
Kristy Robledo
,
Val Gebski
,
Rebecca Asher
,
Vanessa Behan
,
James Nicklin
,
Robert L. Coleman
,
Andreas Obermair
·
YOU?
·
· 2018
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1806395
· OA: W2898881288
YOU?
·
· 2018
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1806395
· OA: W2898881288
In this trial, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with lower rates of disease-free survival and overall survival than open abdominal radical hysterectomy among women with early-stage cervical cancer. (Funded by the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and Medtronic; LACC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00614211 .).
Related Topics
Finding more related topics…