The Limits of Model‐Based Regulation Article Swipe
Related Concepts
Capital requirement
Capital (architecture)
Asset (computer security)
Capital adequacy ratio
Loan
Financial stability
Bank regulation
Monetary economics
Business
Economics
Stability (learning theory)
Actuarial science
Finance
Financial system
Microeconomics
Computer science
Computer security
Profit (economics)
Incentive
Machine learning
History
Archaeology
Markus Behn
,
Rainer Haselmann
,
Vikrant Vig
·
YOU?
·
· 2022
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13124
· OA: W3124947353
YOU?
·
· 2022
· Open Access
·
· DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13124
· OA: W3124947353
Using loan‐level data from Germany, we investigate how the introduction of model‐based capital regulation affected banks' ability to absorb shocks. The objective of this regulation was to enhance financial stability by making capital requirements responsive to asset risk. Our evidence suggests that banks “optimized” model‐based regulation to lower their capital requirements. Banks systematically underreported risk, with underreporting more pronounced for banks with higher gains from it. Moreover, large banks benefitted from the regulation at the expense of smaller banks. Overall, our results suggest that sophisticated rules may have undesired effects if strategic misbehavior is difficult to detect.
Related Topics
Finding more related topics…