Leading And Assessing A First Semester Team Design Project Article Swipe

MAKE IMPACT

Kyle R. Mankin · YOU? · · 2020 · Open Access · · DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2815

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract Leading and Assessing a First-Semester Team Design Project Abstract Students are known to be motivated by course activities that are relevant to their careers. Design projects offer this type of real-life experience. This paper describes implementation and assessment of a design project that was adapted to a first-semester course that included both biological and agricultural engineering (BAE) and agricultural technology management (ATM) students. The project provided opportunity for experiential learning that engaged students, provided essential problem solving and teamwork skills, and assessed their learning about the design process. Students prepared a functional layout design for one of the BAE/ATM student spaces within Seaton Hall. The development of the layout design followed the design process, culminating in a presentation to the client (Department Head) and other constituents. Students were assessed using self-assessment, assessment of the presentation, and a short-answer exam. Results were classified according to seven elements of the design process: 1) teamwork, 2) information gathering, 3) problem definition, 4) idea generation, 5) evaluation and decision making, 6) implementation, and 7) communication. Students appeared to learn in proportion to their perceived level of class emphasis in the problem definition element and the teamwork element. Higher levels of understanding were demonstrated in the communication element and the information gathering element despite a perceived lesser class emphasis. Further work is needed to control for student knowledge of the design process elements when entering the class. Introduction Engineering design and development of student design skills are receiving increased attention as critical elements in engineering education, countering the established trend of focusing on education of the engineering sciences1. Methods to teach the engineering process require a breadth of instructional methods, classroom environments, and assignment types. However, little research has been conducted to compare the effectiveness of these methods for engineering design instruction1. A recent study confirmed that students are motivated by classroom environments that incorporate interaction and discussion (particularly higher-GPA students) and hands-on activities (particularly lower-GPA students) and assignments that demonstrate a clear connection to their profession6. While there is no one “right way” to teach the design process, it is clear that the creative learning required for engineering design requires creative instructional methods. In addition, it is essential that these methods be assessed to enhance the understanding of strengths and weaknesses of various instructional methods7. The objectives of this study were (a) to assess student learning outcomes of the design process and (b) to provide feedback about the effectiveness of a first-year design project and supporting course activities in leading to those outcomes. Course and Design Project Description The class consisted of two lab sections with 22-23 students each. Characteristics of the class sections are summarized in Table 1. Teams were selected by an in-class process, whereby

Type

article

Language

en

Landing Page

https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2815

PDF

https://peer.asee.org/2815.pdf

OA Status

gold

Cited By

1

References

6

Related Works

10

OpenAlex ID

https://openalex.org/W2626941263

Raw OpenAlex JSON

OpenAlex ID

https://openalex.org/W2626941263

Canonical identifier for this work in OpenAlex

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2815

Digital Object Identifier

Title

Leading And Assessing A First Semester Team Design Project

Work title

Type

article

OpenAlex work type

Language

en

Primary language

Publication year

2020

Year of publication

Publication date

2020-09-03

Full publication date if available

Authors

Kyle R. Mankin

List of authors in order

Landing page

https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2815

Publisher landing page

PDF URL

https://peer.asee.org/2815.pdf

Direct link to full text PDF

Open access

Yes

Whether a free full text is available

OA status

gold

Open access status per OpenAlex

OA URL

https://peer.asee.org/2815.pdf

Direct OA link when available

Concepts

Computer science, Engineering management, Software engineering, Engineering

Top concepts (fields/topics) attached by OpenAlex

Cited by

1

Total citation count in OpenAlex

Citations by year (recent)

2020: 1

Per-year citation counts (last 5 years)

References (count)

6

Number of works referenced by this work

Related works (count)

10

Other works algorithmically related by OpenAlex

Full payload