Peripheral Perfusion Index: An Adjunct for the ED Triage or a Powerful Objective Tool to Predict Patient Outcomes? Article Swipe

PDF

Related Concepts

Medicine Triage Receiver operating characteristic Emergency department Emergency medicine Ambulatory Pulse oximetry Prospective cohort study Intensive care Vital signs Intensive care medicine Internal medicine Surgery Anesthesia Psychiatry

Veysi Siber , Serdal Ateş , Tuba Şafak , Esra Güney , Aycan Uluçay , Şeyda Gedikaslan , Sinan Özdemir , Muhammed Sezai Bazna , Michał Pruc , Paweł Patrzylas , Łukasz Szarpak , Burak Katipoğlu , Ahmet Burak Erdem ·

YOU? · · 2025 · Open Access · · DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134616 · OA: W4411800887

Background/Objectives: Accurate and timely triage is essential for optimizing clinical outcomes and resource allocation in emergency departments (EDs). The Peripheral Perfusion Index (PPI), a non-invasive and objective parameter derived from pulse oximetry, may offer added value in early risk stratification. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between the PPI measured at triage and at Emergency Severity Index (ESI) levels, as well as to determine if the PPI may function as a predictive tool to facilitate early risk identification before patient disposition. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, adult ambulatory patients presenting to a tertiary care ED were enrolled. At triage, PPI and standard vital signs were recorded, and patients were classified using the five-level ESI system. The diagnostic performance of PPI and ESI in predicting ED discharge was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with comparative evaluation performed via DeLong’s test. Results: Lower PPI values were consistently associated with higher ESI acuity levels and more intensive care requirements. Patients who were discharged had significantly higher median PPI values (4.0) compared to those admitted to wards (2.1) or intensive care units (1.9). PPI also distinguished survivors from non-survivors (median PPI: 3.60 vs. 1.15). ROC analysis showed that the PPI demonstrated a good discriminative capacity for forecasting ED discharge, equal to the efficacy of ESI (AUC: 0.926 vs. 0.903; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The PPI could improve post-triage risk classification and enhance current triage techniques like ESI, especially in cases of unclear or borderline presentations, but further validation in prospective trials is required.