Who Decides? Article Swipe

PDF

Related Concepts

Variety (cybernetics) Publishing Public administration Political science Public relations Business Power (physics) Law Computer science Quantum mechanics Physics Artificial intelligence

Ivy Anderson , Mel DeSart , Lee Cheng Ean , Rémi Gaillard , Susan Gibbons , Adam Huftalen , Joan K. Lippincott , S. Mele , Ralf Schimmer , Deborah D. Stine , J. M. Vaughan ·

YOU? · · 2016 · Open Access · · DOI: https://doi.org/10.13021/g8sk5h · OA: W4251504014

Tied to [the] question of who should decide the future of open access, who should have the power to make changes to scholarly publishing practices? Do these powers flow from publishers, institutions, tenure committees, funding agencies, authors, or all of the above? All of the above? None of the above? What are the pros, cons, and consequences of different institutions and interest groups developing and implementing their own solutions (even the one-off variety)? Is federal oversight needed? Global coordination (through an organization like UNESCO)?