Bart de Jong
YOU?
Author Swipe
View article: Women’s and Men’s Authorship Experiences: A Prospective Meta-Analysis
Women’s and Men’s Authorship Experiences: A Prospective Meta-Analysis Open
The opaqueness of author naming and ordering, when coupled with power dynamics, can lead to a number of disadvantages in academic careers. In this commentary, we investigate gender differences in authorship experiences in a large prospecti…
View article: Felt trust: Added baggage or added value? A critical review, constructive redirection, and exploratory meta‐analysis
Felt trust: Added baggage or added value? A critical review, constructive redirection, and exploratory meta‐analysis Open
Summary After decades of scholarly focus on studying trust from the trustor's perspective, there has been a rapidly growing interest in understanding trust from the trustee's perspective, with a particular focus on felt trust (i.e., a trus…
View article: An examination of shared leadership configurations and their effectiveness in teams
An examination of shared leadership configurations and their effectiveness in teams Open
Summary A key challenge in the shared leadership literature has been a limited understanding of how multiple leadership activities are shared across team members and roles. We address this issue by conceptualizing and operationalizing shar…
View article: A Parametric 3D Model of Human Airways for Particle Drug Delivery and Deposition
A Parametric 3D Model of Human Airways for Particle Drug Delivery and Deposition Open
The treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease relies on forced inhalation of drug particles. Their distribution is essential for maximizing the outcomes. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations …
View article: Trust Within the Workplace: A Review of Two Waves of Research and a Glimpse of the Third
Trust Within the Workplace: A Review of Two Waves of Research and a Glimpse of the Third Open
Over the past quarter century, trust has emerged as a core concept in organizational psychology and organizational behavior. We review the body of research amassed over that period using a field evolutionary lens and identify two “waves” t…
View article: Trust Consensus Within Culturally Diverse Teams: A Multistudy Investigation
Trust Consensus Within Culturally Diverse Teams: A Multistudy Investigation Open
Despite tremendous progress toward understanding trust within teams, research has predominately conceptualized team trust as a shared group construct, focusing almost exclusively on trust magnitude (i.e., mean level of trust) while ignorin…
View article: Start-Up Teams: A Multidimensional Conceptualization, Integrative Review of Past Research, and Future Research Agenda
Start-Up Teams: A Multidimensional Conceptualization, Integrative Review of Past Research, and Future Research Agenda Open
Academic interest in start-up teams has grown dramatically over the past 40 years, with researchers from a wide variety of disciplines actively studying the topic. Although this widespread interest is encouraging, a review of the literatur…
View article: Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration.
Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration. Open
Hierarchy has the potential to both benefit and harm team effectiveness. In this article, we meta-analytically investigate different explanations for why and when hierarchy helps or hurts team effectiveness, drawing on results from 54 prio…
View article: The future of organizational trust research:A content-analytic synthesis of scholarly recommendations and review of recent developments
The future of organizational trust research:A content-analytic synthesis of scholarly recommendations and review of recent developments Open
This chapter contributes to defining a common research agenda on organizational trust, first by content-analyzing scholarly recommendations for future research published between 2007 and 2011 across 347 articles and 58 social science journ…
View article: Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates.
Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Open
Cumulating evidence from 112 independent studies (N = 7,763 teams), we meta-analytically examine the fundamental questions of whether intrateam trust is positively related to team performance, and the conditions under which it is particula…
View article: Trust and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Main Effects, Moderators, and Covariates
Trust and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Main Effects, Moderators, and Covariates Open
Cumulating evidence from 112 independent studies (N = 7,763 teams), we meta-analytically examine the fundamental questions of whether intrateam trust is positively related to team performance, and the conditions under which it is particula…