Gust Annis
YOU?
Author Swipe
View article: Towards a framework for invasive aquatic plant survey design in Great Lakes coastal areas
Towards a framework for invasive aquatic plant survey design in Great Lakes coastal areas Open
At least 65 aquatic plant species have been identified as part of a surveillance list of non-native species that pose a threat to biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Early detection of these potentially invas…
View article: A framework for aquatic invasive species surveillance site selection and prioritization in the US waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes
A framework for aquatic invasive species surveillance site selection and prioritization in the US waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes Open
Risk-based prioritization for early detection monitoring is of utmost importance to prevent and mitigate invasive species impacts. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, a binational commitment between the United States and Canada to res…
View article: Suitability of Laurentian Great Lakes for invasive species based on global species distribution models and local habitat
Suitability of Laurentian Great Lakes for invasive species based on global species distribution models and local habitat Open
Efficient management and prevention of species invasions requires accurate prediction of where species of concern can arrive and persist. Species distribution models provide one way to identify potentially suitable habitat by developing th…
View article: Suitability of Laurentian Great Lakes for invasive species based on global species distribution models and local habitat
Suitability of Laurentian Great Lakes for invasive species based on global species distribution models and local habitat Open
Efficient management and prevention of species invasions requires accurate prediction of where species of concern can arrive and persist. Species distribution models provide one way to identify potentially suitable habitat by developing th…
View article: Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits
Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits Open
Conservation scientists increasingly recognize that incorporating human values into conservation planning increases the chances for success by garnering broader project acceptance. However, methods for defining quantitative targets for the…
View article: How much conservation is enough? Defining implementation goals for healthy fish communities in agricultural rivers
How much conservation is enough? Defining implementation goals for healthy fish communities in agricultural rivers Open
"How much conservation is enough?" is one of the most important and difficult questions to answer. In this work, we demonstrate an approach to specifically answer this question for conservation strategies designed to address nonpoint sourc…
View article: The Great Lakes Hydrography Dataset: Consistent, Binational Watersheds for the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin
The Great Lakes Hydrography Dataset: Consistent, Binational Watersheds for the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin Open
Ecosystem‐based management of the Laurentian Great Lakes, which spans both the United States and Canada, is hampered by the lack of consistent binational watersheds for the entire Basin. Using comparable data sources and consistent methods…
View article: Appendix N. A list of 45 native fish, mussel, and crayfish species that are currently not represented in GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands.
Appendix N. A list of 45 native fish, mussel, and crayfish species that are currently not represented in GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands. Open
A list of 45 native fish, mussel, and crayfish species that are currently not represented in GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands.
View article: Appendix A. A table detailing the hierarchical framework with defining physical and biological features used for classifying and mapping riverine ecosystems.
Appendix A. A table detailing the hierarchical framework with defining physical and biological features used for classifying and mapping riverine ecosystems. Open
A table detailing the hierarchical framework with defining physical and biological features used for classifying and mapping riverine ecosystems.
View article: Appendix B. A map showing the Ecological Drainage Units (EDUs) of Missouri.
Appendix B. A map showing the Ecological Drainage Units (EDUs) of Missouri. Open
A map showing the Ecological Drainage Units (EDUs) of Missouri.
View article: Appendix O. A map showing number and percentage of native fish, mussel, and crayfish species that are not represented within the GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands of each Ecological Drainage Unit (EDU).
Appendix O. A map showing number and percentage of native fish, mussel, and crayfish species that are not represented within the GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands of each Ecological Drainage Unit (EDU). Open
A map showing number and percentage of native fish, mussel, and crayfish species that are not represented within the GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands of each Ecological Drainage Unit (EDU).
View article: Appendix H. A map of stream segments flowing through GAP management status 1 or 2 lands, further broken down by stream size.
Appendix H. A map of stream segments flowing through GAP management status 1 or 2 lands, further broken down by stream size. Open
A map of stream segments flowing through GAP management status 1 or 2 lands, further broken down by stream size.
View article: Appendix G. Maps showing the individual component values and overall combined values in the human-threat index (HTI) for each of Aquatic Ecological System in Missouri.
Appendix G. Maps showing the individual component values and overall combined values in the human-threat index (HTI) for each of Aquatic Ecological System in Missouri. Open
Maps showing the individual component values and overall combined values in the human-threat index (HTI) for each of Aquatic Ecological System in Missouri.
View article: Appendix L. Maps showing the major human disturbances affecting those Aquatic Ecological Systems (AESs) that have all stream sizes represented as an interconnected complex within GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands.
Appendix L. Maps showing the major human disturbances affecting those Aquatic Ecological Systems (AESs) that have all stream sizes represented as an interconnected complex within GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands. Open
Maps showing the major human disturbances affecting those Aquatic Ecological Systems (AESs) that have all stream sizes represented as an interconnected complex within GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands.
View article: Appendix C. A map of the 39 distinct Aquatic Ecological System (AES) types for Missouri.
Appendix C. A map of the 39 distinct Aquatic Ecological System (AES) types for Missouri. Open
A map of the 39 distinct Aquatic Ecological System (AES) types for Missouri.
View article: Appendix P. A map showing number and percentage of native fish, mussel, and crayfish species that have less than two distinct occurrences with the GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands of each Ecological Drainage Unit (EDU).
Appendix P. A map showing number and percentage of native fish, mussel, and crayfish species that have less than two distinct occurrences with the GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands of each Ecological Drainage Unit (EDU). Open
A map showing number and percentage of native fish, mussel, and crayfish species that have less than two distinct occurrences with the GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands of each Ecological Drainage Unit (EDU).
View article: Appendix E. Maps of predicted total species richness (fish, mussels, and crayfish) and predicted richness of globally rare, threatened, and endangered species for Missouri.
Appendix E. Maps of predicted total species richness (fish, mussels, and crayfish) and predicted richness of globally rare, threatened, and endangered species for Missouri. Open
Maps of predicted total species richness (fish, mussels, and crayfish) and predicted richness of globally rare, threatened, and endangered species for Missouri.
View article: Appendix D. A map example showing nine distinct Valley Segment Types (VSTs) that occur within a single 12-digit hydrologic unit.
Appendix D. A map example showing nine distinct Valley Segment Types (VSTs) that occur within a single 12-digit hydrologic unit. Open
A map example showing nine distinct Valley Segment Types (VSTs) that occur within a single 12-digit hydrologic unit.
View article: Appendix K. Maps showing Aquatic Ecological Systems (AESs) that have all stream size classes represented in GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands.
Appendix K. Maps showing Aquatic Ecological Systems (AESs) that have all stream size classes represented in GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands. Open
Maps showing Aquatic Ecological Systems (AESs) that have all stream size classes represented in GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands.
View article: Appendix J. A map showing the number and percentage of Valley Segment Types (VSTs) that are represented in GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands for each Ecological Drainage Unit.
Appendix J. A map showing the number and percentage of Valley Segment Types (VSTs) that are represented in GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands for each Ecological Drainage Unit. Open
A map showing the number and percentage of Valley Segment Types (VSTs) that are represented in GAP management-status 1 or 2 lands for each Ecological Drainage Unit.
View article: Appendix I. A table providing conservation status statistics for 74 distinct Valley Segment Types (VSTs) in Missouri.
Appendix I. A table providing conservation status statistics for 74 distinct Valley Segment Types (VSTs) in Missouri. Open
A table providing conservation status statistics for 74 distinct Valley Segment Types (VSTs) in Missouri.
View article: Appendix M. Statewide management-status statistics for each fish, mussel, and crayfish species in Missouri, by stream length.
Appendix M. Statewide management-status statistics for each fish, mussel, and crayfish species in Missouri, by stream length. Open
Statewide management-status statistics for each fish, mussel, and crayfish species in Missouri, by stream length.
View article: Appendix F. A map of stream segments flowing through public land categorized by GAP management status.
Appendix F. A map of stream segments flowing through public land categorized by GAP management status. Open
A map of stream segments flowing through public land categorized by GAP management status.