Jennifer Tetzlaff
YOU?
Author Swipe
View article: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Open
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found…
View article: PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews Open
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Anal…
View article: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Open
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found…
View article: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Open
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found…
View article: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Open
Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
View article: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Open
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found…
View article: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Open
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what…
View article: PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews Open
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Anal…
View article: PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews Open
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Anal…
View article: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Open
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what…
View article: Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement Open
Objectives: To describe the processes used to update the PRISMA 2009 statement for reporting systematic reviews, present results of a survey conducted to inform the update, summarise decisions made at the PRISMA update meeting, and describ…
View article: Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews
Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews Open
This study suggests important false inclusion and exclusion rates by human reviewers. When deciding the validity of a future automated study selection algorithm, it is important to keep in mind that the gold standard is not perfect and tha…
View article: SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials
SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials Open
The protocol of a clinical trial serves as the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and appraisal. However, trial protocols and existing protocol guidelines vary greatly in content and quality. This article describes the syst…
View article: Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study Open
An increasing number of SRs are being published, and many are poorly conducted and reported. Strategies are needed to help reduce this avoidable waste in research.