Jesper Wiborg Schneider
YOU?
Author Swipe
View article: A conceptual review of uses and meanings of reproducibility and replication
A conceptual review of uses and meanings of reproducibility and replication Open
We review uses and meanings of reproducibility and replication as well as related terms in the literature across the research landscape. Based on the analysis of the review and due to the prevailing conceptual confusion surrounding the rep…
View article: A conceptual review of uses and meanings of reproducibility and replication
A conceptual review of uses and meanings of reproducibility and replication Open
We review uses and meanings of reproducibility and replication as well as related terms in the literature across the research landscape. Based on the analysis of the review and due to the prevailing conceptual confusion surrounding the rep…
View article: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions Open
View article: Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment
Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment Open
The Villum Experiment (VEX) is one of the few funding schemes that employs a double-blind review process where applicants are blinded to reviewers, applications are highly standardized, reviewers do not deliberate, and funding is determine…
View article: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – a survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – a survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions Open
This study explores the use of generative AI (GenAI) and research integrity assessments of use cases by researchers, including PhD students, at Danish universities. Conducted through a survey sent to all Danish researchers from January to …
View article: Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research
Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research Open
Questionable research practices (QRP) are believed to be widespread, but empirical assessments are generally restricted to a few types of practices. Furthermore, conceptual confusion is rife with use and prevalence of QRPs often being conf…
View article: Does double-blind peer review effectively correct for gender disparities in research funding?
Does double-blind peer review effectively correct for gender disparities in research funding? Open
New mechanisms for mitigating biases in grant peer review have been proposed. One such mechanism is blinding reviewers to the identity of grant applicants, but evidence of its effectiveness remains scarce. We leverage detailed information …
View article: Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective
Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective Open
We argue that frequentist hypothesis testing – the dominant statistical evaluation paradigm in empirical research – is fundamentally unsuited for analysis of the non-experimental data prevalent in economics and other social sciences. Frequ…
View article: Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research.
Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research. Open
Questionable research practices (QRP) are believed to be widespread, but empirical assessments are generally restricted to a few types of practices. Furthermore, conceptual confusion is rife with use and prevalence of QRPs often being conf…
View article: Centers of Excellence from the Danish National Research Foundation 1993-2005
Centers of Excellence from the Danish National Research Foundation 1993-2005 Open
The Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF) asked the Danish Center for Studies in Research and Research Policy (CFA) to conduct a retrospective analysis of the DNRF Centers of Excellence (CoEs) from the initial three rounds from 1993-2…
View article: Quantifying the mover’s advantage: transatlantic migration, employment prestige, and scientific performance
Quantifying the mover’s advantage: transatlantic migration, employment prestige, and scientific performance Open
Research on scientific careers finds a mover’s advantage. International migration correlates with increased visibility and productivity. However, if scientists who move internationally, on average, enter into more prestigious employments t…
View article: Mapping the Narrow Reproducibility Discourse
Mapping the Narrow Reproducibility Discourse Open
We constructed citation maps of eight canonical articles in the reproducibility discourse of the reform movement in science to explore how this discourse travels through the research landscape. The map indicates that this discourse largely…
View article: Gendered trajectories in (early-career) international research mobility: mobility prospects and career impact
Gendered trajectories in (early-career) international research mobility: mobility prospects and career impact Open
International research mobility is becoming increasingly important for early-career researchers as a way to demonstrate their ambition and excellence. It can offer access to crucial research infrastructure and help expand international col…
View article: Estimating social bias in data sharing behaviours: an open science experiment
Estimating social bias in data sharing behaviours: an open science experiment Open
View article: Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective
Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective Open
We argue that frequentist hypothesis testing - the dominant statistical evaluationparadigm in empirical research - is fundamentally unsuited for analysis of the non-experimental data prevalent in economics and other social sciences. Freque…
View article: The scientific impact of Danish research 1980-2020
The scientific impact of Danish research 1980-2020 Open
In 2012, Gunnar Öquist and Mats Benner published a report that drew attention to an impressive increase over the period 1990 to 2010 in the mean citation impact of Danish research and in its proportion of highly cited papers. The developme…
View article: Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective
Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective Open
View article: TIER2: enhancing Trust, Integrity and Efficiency in Research through next-level Reproducibility
TIER2: enhancing Trust, Integrity and Efficiency in Research through next-level Reproducibility Open
Lack of reproducibility of research results has become a major theme in recent years. As we emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, economic pressures and exposed consequences of lack of societal trust in science make addressing reproducibility…
View article: Institution and gender-related differences in publication speed before and during COVID-19
Institution and gender-related differences in publication speed before and during COVID-19 Open
The COVID-19 pandemic elicited a substantial hike in journal submissions and a global push to get medical evidence quickly through the review process. Editorial decisions and peer-assessments were made under intensified time constraints, w…
View article: Ungendered writing: Writing styles are unlikely to account for gender differences in funding rates in the natural and technical sciences
Ungendered writing: Writing styles are unlikely to account for gender differences in funding rates in the natural and technical sciences Open
Academia has traditionally faced a substantial gender gap in staff positions and career path progression. Women do not advance up the academic career ladder in the same rate as men, with evidence of gender bias in hiring, earnings, funding…
View article: Ungendered Writing: Writing Styles are Unlikely to Account for Gender Differences in Funding Rates in the Natural and Technical Sciences
Ungendered Writing: Writing Styles are Unlikely to Account for Gender Differences in Funding Rates in the Natural and Technical Sciences Open
View article: Meta-Research: How problematic citing practices distort science
Meta-Research: How problematic citing practices distort science Open
Citing practices constitute a core element in scientific research and communication in which they serve several important functions. They both comprise the principal unit of science’s social reward system and they establish epistemic genea…
View article: Selective referencing and questionable evidence in Strumia’s paper on “Gender issues in fundamental physics”
Selective referencing and questionable evidence in Strumia’s paper on “Gender issues in fundamental physics” Open
View article: Decision letter: A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 2018
Decision letter: A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 2018 Open
View article: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige
Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige Open
A number of studies suggest that scientific papers with women in leading-author positions attract fewer citations than those with men in leading-author positions. We report the results of a matched case-control study of 1,269,542 papers in…
View article: Author response: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige
Author response: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige Open
View article: Examining national citation impact by comparing developments in a fixed and a dynamic journal set
Examining national citation impact by comparing developments in a fixed and a dynamic journal set Open
View article: 1.3 million disease research papers with citation impact and gender information
1.3 million disease research papers with citation impact and gender information Open
The dataset provides information on the gender of first and last author, author composition, field and topic mean gender, as well as citation impact for 1.3 million papers indexed with the "Diseases Category" MeSH term.
View article: Consistency of interdisciplinarity measures.
Consistency of interdisciplinarity measures. Open
Assessing interdisciplinarity is an important and challenging work in bibliometric studies. Previous studies tend to emphasize that the nature and concept of interdisciplinary is ambiguous and uncertain (e.g. Leydesdorff & Rafols 2010, Raf…
View article: Exploration of reproducibility issues in scientometric research
Exploration of reproducibility issues in scientometric research Open
This is a small-scale explorative study in an effort to assess reproducibility issues specific to scientometrics research. This effort is motivated by the desire to generate empirical data to inform debates about reproducibility in sciento…