Monya Baker
YOU?
Author Swipe
View article: The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research Open
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of in…
View article: The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research Open
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of in…
View article: The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research Open
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of in…
View article: Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 Open
Improving the reproducibility of biomedical research is a major challenge. Transparent and accurate reporting is vital to this process; it allows readers to assess the reliability of the findings and repeat or build upon the work of other …
View article: The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research Open
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of in…
View article: The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research*
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research* Open
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of in…
View article: The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animalresearchThe ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animalresearch
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animalresearchThe ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animalresearch Open
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of in…
View article: How to stop the errors and retain the real: Researchers need transparency, better indexing, and a willingness to look again at the paper they intend to cite
How to stop the errors and retain the real: Researchers need transparency, better indexing, and a willingness to look again at the paper they intend to cite Open
Papers are cited for years after they are retracted, usually without any indication that they are no longer officially part of the scientific literature. Many people citing these works likely do not know about the retractions: once a citat…
View article: Additional file 5 of The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Additional file 5 of The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research Open
Additional file 5. Road testing data. Tab 1: Participants’ demographics and general feedback on the guidelines and the E&E preprints. Tab 2: Outcome of each manuscript’s assessment and justifications provided by participants for not includ…
View article: Additional file 3 of The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Additional file 3 of The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research Open
Additional file 3. Delphi data. Tabs 1, 2, and 3: Panel members’ scores for each of the ARRIVE items during rounds 1, 2, and 3, along with descriptive statistics. Tab. 4: Qualitative feedback, collected from panel members during round 1, o…
View article: Reporting animal research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2019
Reporting animal research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2019 Open
Improving the reproducibility of biomedical research is a major challenge. Transparent and accurate reporting are vital to this process; it allows readers to assess the reliability of the findings, and repeat or build upon the work of othe…
View article: The ARRIVE guidelines 2019: updated guidelines for reporting animal research
The ARRIVE guidelines 2019: updated guidelines for reporting animal research Open
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in v…
View article: Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope
Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope Open
In 2010, the NC3Rs published the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines to improve the reporting of animal research. Despite considerable levels of support from the scientific community, the impact on the qua…
View article: Cancer reproducibility project releases first results
Cancer reproducibility project releases first results Open
An open-science effort to replicate dozens of cancer-biology studies is off to a confusing start.