Thomas Klebel
YOU?
Author Swipe
View article: Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review
Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review Open
Various open science practices have been proposed to improve the reproducibility and replicability of scientific research, but not for all practices, there may be evidence they are indeed effective. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review…
View article: Introduction to structural causal models in science studies
Introduction to structural causal models in science studies Open
Sound causal inference is crucial for advancing the study of science. Incorrectly interpreting predictive effects as causal might lead to ineffective or even detrimental policy recommendations. Many publications in science studies lack app…
View article: The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review
The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review Open
Open Science seeks to make research processes and outputs more accessible, transparent and inclusive, ensuring that scientific findings can be freely shared, scrutinized and built upon by researchers and others. To date, there has been no …
View article: The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review
The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review Open
Open Science seeks to make research processes and outputs more accessible, transparent, andinclusive, ensuring that scientific findings can be freely shared, scrutinised, and built-upon byresearchers and others. To date, there has been no …
View article: Open Science Impact Indicator Handbook
Open Science Impact Indicator Handbook Open
This is the first release of the Open Science Impact Indicator Handbook. This release also constitutes the D2.1 and D2.3 deliverable in the context of the PathOS project.
View article: The Impact of Open Science – what do we really know?
The Impact of Open Science – what do we really know? Open
IntroductionOpen Science (OS) is increasingly mainstream, with wide adoption of practices like Open Access and FAIR data. While systems and data sources for monitoring the uptake of these practices are now relatively mature, research to es…
View article: The paradox of competition: How funding models could undermine the uptake of data sharing practices
The paradox of competition: How funding models could undermine the uptake of data sharing practices Open
Although beneficial to scientific development, data sharing is still uncommon in many research areas. Various organisations, including funding agencies that endorse open science, aim to increase its uptake. However, estimating the large-sc…
View article: The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review
The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review Open
Open Science seeks to make research processes and outputs more accessible, transparent, andinclusive, ensuring that scientific findings can be freely shared, scrutinised, and built-upon byresearchers and others. To date, there has been no …
View article: The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review
The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review Open
Open Science seeks to make research processes and outputs more accessible, transparent, andinclusive, ensuring that scientific findings can be freely shared, scrutinised, and built-upon byresearchers and others. To date, there has been no …
View article: Open Science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review preprint
Open Science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review preprint Open
Various interventions – especially those related to open science – have been proposed to improve the reproducibility and replicability of scientific research. To assess whether and which interventions have been formally tested for their ef…
View article: The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review
The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review Open
Open Science (OS) aims, in part, to drive greater societal impact of academic research. Government, funder and institutional policies state that it should further democratize research and increase learning and awareness, evidence-based pol…
View article: The societal impact of Open Science–a scoping review
The societal impact of Open Science–a scoping review Open
Open Science (OS) aims, in part, to drive greater societal impact of academic research. Government, funder and institutional policies state that it should further democratise research and increase learning and awareness, evidence-based pol…
View article: Introduction to causality in science studies
Introduction to causality in science studies Open
Sound causal inference is crucial for advancing the study of science. Incorrectly interpreting predictive effects as causal might be ineffective or even detrimental to policy recommendations. Many publications in science studies lack appro…
View article: Data from "The societal impact of Open Science - a scoping review"
Data from "The societal impact of Open Science - a scoping review" Open
These files include the data from the "The societal impact of Open Science - a scoping review", part of a series of studies conducetd within the PathOS Horizon Europe project on the academic, economic, and societal impacts of Open Science.…
View article: Data from "The societal impact of Open Science - a scoping review"
Data from "The societal impact of Open Science - a scoping review" Open
These files include the data from the "The societal impact of Open Science - a scoping review", part of a series of studies conducetd within the PathOS Horizon Europe project on the academic, economic, and societal impacts of Open Science.…
View article: Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure
Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure Open
There are currently broad moves to reform research assessment, especially to better incentivize open and responsible research and avoid problematic use of inappropriate quantitative indicators. This study adds to the evidence base for such…
View article: PathOS - D2.1 - D2.2 - Open Science Indicator Handbook
PathOS - D2.1 - D2.2 - Open Science Indicator Handbook Open
This document outlines the primary components and objectives of the Open Science Indicators Handbook. Objective and Scope: Deliverable D2.2 represents the inaugural release of the Open Science Indicators Handbook. This compilation encompas…
View article: PathOS - D1.2 Scoping Review of Open Science Impact
PathOS - D1.2 Scoping Review of Open Science Impact Open
This report details work to systematically scope evidence of the academic, societal and economic impacts of Open Science. It is guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodological framework, and was limited to wo…
View article: TIER2 D1.1 Project handbook
TIER2 D1.1 Project handbook Open
This project deliverable has been submitted to, but not yet reviewed by the Research Executive Agency, and might thus be subject to change. The project handbook outlines the internal procedures of the TIER2 project in terms of project exec…
View article: Data from "PathOS - D1.2 Scoping Review of Open Science Impact"
Data from "PathOS - D1.2 Scoping Review of Open Science Impact" Open
This dataset contains the data from the Scoping Review of Open Science Impact. Included are all record for which we assessed the full-text. The columns are as follows: id: Internal identifier Several metadata columns from Scopus/Web of Sci…
View article: Data from "PathOS - D1.2 Scoping Review of Open Science Impact"
Data from "PathOS - D1.2 Scoping Review of Open Science Impact" Open
This dataset contains the data from the Scoping Review of Open Science Impact. Included are all record for which we assessed the full-text. The columns are as follows: id: Internal identifier Several metadata columns from Scopus/Web of Sci…
View article: Data from "PathOS - D1.2 Scoping Review of Open Science Impact"
Data from "PathOS - D1.2 Scoping Review of Open Science Impact" Open
This dataset contains the data from the Scoping Review of Open Science Impact. Included are all record for which we assessed the full-text. The columns are as follows: id: Internal identifier Several metadata columns from Scopus/Web of Sci…
View article: Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria
Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria Open
There are currently broad moves to reform research assessment, especially to better incentivise open and responsible research and avoid problematic use of inappropriate quantitative indicators. This study adds to the evidence-base for such…
View article: The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing
The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing Open
Current implementations of Open Access (OA) publishing frequently involve article processing charges (APCs). Increasing evidence has emerged that APCs impede researchers with fewer resources in publishing their research as OA. We analyzed …
View article: Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility"
Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility" Open
This snapshot contains code and data for the preprint "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and respon…
View article: Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility"
Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility" Open
This snapshot contains code and data for the preprint "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and respon…
View article: TIER2: enhancing Trust, Integrity and Efficiency in Research through next-level Reproducibility
TIER2: enhancing Trust, Integrity and Efficiency in Research through next-level Reproducibility Open
Lack of reproducibility of research results has become a major theme in recent years. As we emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, economic pressures and exposed consequences of lack of societal trust in science make addressing reproducibility…
View article: The APC-Effect: Stratification in Open Access Publishing
The APC-Effect: Stratification in Open Access Publishing Open
Current implementations of Open Access (OA) publishing frequently involve Article Publishing Charges (APCs). Increasing evidence emerges that APCs impede researchers with fewer resources in publishing their research OA. We analysed 1.5 mil…
View article: Data for "The APC-Barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing"
Data for "The APC-Barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing" Open
Dataset to reproduce the analysis of the paper "The APC-Barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing". An earlier version of the manuscript with the title "The APC-Effect: Stratification in Open Access Publishing" is …